EFIC pain curricula

The Pain Management Core Curriculum for European Medical Schools

This curriculum sets out the core pain content that every medical student in Europe should cover before qualifying. It is written to be taught in a defined number of sessions during the clinical years, and is designed to fit inside an existing medical degree rather than to sit alongside it.

Its scope is deliberately narrow. The curriculum teaches general pain management, not specialist practice: the aim is that a newly qualified doctor can identify a person in pain, assess it, apply effective first-line analgesia, recognise when pain is becoming chronic, and know when to refer on. Specialist knowledge of complex chronic pain is left to postgraduate training.

At a glance
ProfessionMedicine
LevelUndergraduate, clinical years (third to fifth year students)
Current versionJune 2013
Structure7 sections, taught across 6 modules
Teaching time5 lectures of 45 minutes and 5 bedside sessions of 90 minutes
Developed byThe EFIC® Committee on Education, adapting a curriculum of the German Pain Society (DGSS), the German Chapter of IASP
Linked examinationNone. This curriculum supports undergraduate teaching and is not assessed by EFIC®
LanguagesEnglish

Who this curriculum is for

The curriculum is addressed to medical faculties and to the people who design undergraduate teaching. It was written for students in their clinical semesters, on the basis that every practising doctor will meet people living with pain, whatever their eventual specialty, and that pain is among the most common reasons for consulting a general practitioner.

It is used by:

  • Medical faculties and curriculum committees introducing or reviewing pain teaching in an undergraduate programme.
  • Course leads and lecturers who need a ready-made structure, module plan, and set of learning objectives.
  • National pain societies making the case to their medical schools for dedicated pain teaching.
  • Accreditation and quality assurance bodies looking for a European reference point on undergraduate pain content.

The rationale. Specialist pain services and continuing education for practising doctors have not, on their own, improved matters for most people living with pain. The absence of pain teaching at medical school is considered an important reason for this. The curriculum was written to address that gap directly, and to give instructors from different disciplines a shared understanding of pain that clarifies learning objectives and avoids duplication between courses.

How the curriculum is taught

Unlike the postgraduate core curricula, this document specifies a teaching format as well as content. It assumes multidisciplinary lecturers, ideally working in pairs, lectures and practical instruction supplemented by student self-study, and bedside groups of no more than six students in which a patient history is taken and then discussed as a case.

Learning objectives are written according to Bloom's taxonomy, using the levels of knowledge, comprehension, and application. Cognitive, applied, and emotional objectives are all specified, the last covering matters such as recognising one's own feelings of helplessness when working with people whose pain has become chronic.

Module Lecture Bedside instruction Curriculum sections
1 Introduction: physiology and psychology of pain, history and examination, pain assessment Not applicable 1.1 to 1.3
2 Acute pain Acute pain 2
3 Cancer pain Cancer pain 3
4 Neuropathic pain Neuropathic pain 4.1 to 4.2
5 Development of pain chronicity Development of pain chronicity 5.1 to 5.2
6 Not applicable Specific therapeutic populations and challenges (optional, or integrated into modules 1 to 5) 6.1 to 6.4

The curriculum is written as a core, so faculties are expected to expand it according to local requirements, available teaching time, and the particular interests of the department.

What the curriculum covers

The teaching is built around four pain syndromes that a newly qualified doctor is most likely to meet: acute post-traumatic and post-operative pain, cancer pain, neuropathic pain, and chronic non-cancer pain. Everything else supports the recognition and management of those four.

Section 1. Introduction: principles of pain management

3 domains · the foundation for all subsequent modules

  • 1.1 Principles of pain management. The definition of pain and the bio-psycho-social model, including the point that pain can develop and persist without a physical lesion; the physiology of pain, covering transduction, transmission, and central processing, and the mechanisms of peripheral and central sensitisation; the psychology of pain, covering affective, cognitive, and behavioural factors, social influences, psychiatric and psychosomatic comorbidity, and the placebo effect; the classification of pain as acute or chronic and as nociceptive or neuropathic; treatment indications; and the comorbidities typically associated with pain.
  • 1.2 Diagnosis. Taking a structured pain history, physical examination, diagnostic tools, and differential blocks, together with the pain rating tools students are expected to be able to use: analogue scales, questionnaires, and pain diaries.
  • 1.3 Principles of pain treatment. Treating cause and symptom; pharmacological management covering opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and co-analgesics; non-pharmacological management covering psychological therapy, counter-irritation procedures, and physiotherapy; the principle that invasive approaches are generally reserved for when simpler ones have failed; patient education; and multidisciplinary pain management programmes based on cognitive-behavioural principles.

Section 2. Acute pain: post-operative and post-traumatic pain

Acute pain is framed as having a warning function, in contrast to most chronic pain, and as carrying a real physiological cost if left untreated. Students are expected to know the post-operative stress response system by system, from tachycardia and increased myocardial oxygen demand through pain-induced hypoventilation to gastric atony and raised thrombo-embolism risk, and to understand that treating the pain is a means of organ protection and earlier mobilisation, not only of comfort.

The applied content covers measuring pain intensity on a numerical rating scale, the hierarchy of administration routes and the exceptions to it, the stepwise approach to acute pain management, the handling of a pain emergency, and specific procedures including regional anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia.

Section 3. Cancer pain

Students are expected to know the aetiology of cancer pain and to distinguish pain caused by the tumour or its metastases, pain caused by treatment such as post-operative wound pain, mucositis, or chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, and pain that is unrelated to the cancer altogether.

The core skill is applying the WHO Pain Relief Ladder across its three steps, with attention to co-analgesics where there is a neuropathic component, and understanding that invasive or neurodestructive procedures follow only after the stepped approach has failed. The section also covers the national prescription regulations for opioids and how to complete a controlled-drug prescription correctly.

Section 4. Neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain is defined by a primary lesion or disease of the nervous system, with the observation that many pain syndromes have both nociceptive and neuropathic components and that conventional analgesics often control neuropathic pain poorly.

Students are expected to understand and use the terms allodynia and hyperalgesia, to recognise the value of a careful history and sensory examination in localising the lesion to a specific nerve or root, and to know the cause, presentation, and treatment of two typical conditions. Two are worked through as examples: polyneuropathy (4.1) and herpes zoster (4.2).

Section 5. Development of pain chronicity

This section teaches the distinction between acute and chronic pain and, importantly, treats chronic pain as a condition in its own right rather than as prolonged acute pain. Students learn that chronic pain has lost its warning function, that it expands beyond the physical into psychological and social dimensions, that managing it by the principles of acute pain management generally fails, and that the signs of developing chronicity need to be recognised early so that an appropriate plan can be put in place.

Two worked examples: chronic non-specific back pain (5.1), including its incidence, prevalence, and socio-economic cost, the differential diagnosis for specific back pain, and the fact that more than 90 per cent of cases have no specific aetiology; and medication-overuse headache (5.2).

Section 6. Specific therapeutic populations and challenges

Optional module, or integrated into modules 1 to 5

  • 6.1 Children. That the responsibility to relieve pain applies equally to infants and children; the heightened pain sensitivity of premature and newborn infants and the possible lifelong consequences of untreated pain; observational assessment using physiological signs, vocalisation, facial expression, motor and sensory changes, and vegetative signs; age-appropriate assessment tools; the principal paediatric analgesics with their indications, weight-based dosing, and side effects; the particular risks of acetylsalicylic acid in children; off-label prescribing; and the availability of non-pharmacological approaches.
  • 6.2 Old age and dementia. That older people living with pain are frequently undertreated, and why: communication barriers, gaps in knowledge about medication in older age, and assumptions about pain sensitivity in dementia. Covers the epidemiology of pain in later life, age-related changes in nociception and central processing, age-related coping styles, psychological comorbidity, the continued usefulness of analogue scales despite cognitive limitation, observational indicators of pain in people unable to communicate, reduced hepatic and renal clearance, polypharmacy, and risks such as opioid-related falls and confusion.
  • 6.3 Pregnancy and breastfeeding. The restricted evidence base for drug safety; risks to the foetus and newborn including neonatal withdrawal and respiratory depression after opioid exposure, premature closure of the ductus arteriosus with NSAIDs in the third trimester, and transfer of medication into breast milk; appropriate procedures and analgesics for pain in labour; and the teratogenic risks of common co-analgesics for women with chronic pain who may become pregnant.
  • 6.4 Addiction and dependence. A balanced approach in which students learn to reduce abuse, addiction, and diversion while recognising the essential medical role of opioid medicines. Covers the definitions of dependence, abuse, and addiction as distinct concepts, the predictors of problematic use, and practical safeguards: screening all patients for prior substance use, giving explicit instructions, and monitoring use over time.

A note on this edition

This is the June 2013 edition and remains the current version. Two points are worth noting for anyone teaching from it.

First, the curriculum quotes the IASP definition of pain published in 1979. IASP revised that definition in 2020, and teaching should use the current wording.

Second, several examples are drawn from the German context in which the curriculum originated, including national narcotics prescription procedures, cost figures, and specific assessment scales. These are illustrative, and faculties should substitute the equivalents for their own health system.

Using this curriculum in your programme

Reading and citing

The curriculum is published openly on this page and may be read, downloaded, and cited in programme documentation, accreditation submissions, and published work, with the EFIC® attribution retained.

Adopting it in a medical degree

The module structure, session lengths, and objectives are written to be implemented directly, and expanded locally where teaching time allows. We would be glad to hear from you if your faculty adopts it.

Adaptation and translation

Please contact us before reproducing, adapting, or translating any part of the curriculum. Requests are discussed individually, and we will work with you on wording, review, and attribution.

Contact us first

Write to secretary@efic.org, telling us which curriculum you are interested in, your institution or organisation, the language or context involved, and how you intend to use it. We will come back to you to discuss how best to proceed.

How to cite this curriculum

European Pain Federation EFIC. The Pain Management Core Curriculum for European Medical Schools. Brussels: European Pain Federation EFIC; June 2013. Available from: https://europeanpainfederation.eu/education/pain-curricula/medical-students/

Download the full curriculum

The complete document contains the full text of every learning objective, the foreword, the educational framework, and the detailed teaching content for each module.

Cover of the EFIC Pain Management Core Curriculum for European Medical Schools

The Pain Management Core Curriculum for European Medical Schools

PDF · English · Version June 2013 · 33 pages

Download the PDF

Origins and version history

The curriculum has its origins in a German document, based on the German Medical Licensure Act in effect since October 2003, and first published for German medical schools in February 2008 by the steering committee of the DGSS, the German Pain Society and German Chapter of IASP. The EFIC® Committee on Education adapted it into a European version for use across the Federation's national chapters.

June 2013, European version
Current version. Adapted and released by the EFIC® Committee on Education.
February 2008, German original
First published for German medical schools by the steering committee of the DGSS, the German Chapter of IASP.

Previous versions are available on request from secretary@efic.org.

MENU